directus-task-management/planning/05-bmad-user-stories.md

18 KiB

Directus Task Management Suite - User Stories & Sprint Planning

User Stories Overview

Epic Structure

The Directus Task Management Suite is organized into 4 main epics, each containing multiple user stories that deliver incremental value while building toward the complete solution.

Epic 1: Core Task Management Foundation

User Story 1.1: Basic Task CRUD Operations

As a developer managing AI projects
I want to create, read, update, and delete tasks through a web interface
So that I can manage my work without relying solely on CLI tools

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can create new tasks with title, description, priority, and status
  • Can view task details in a clean, organized interface
  • Can update task properties through form interfaces
  • Can delete tasks with confirmation dialog
  • All operations sync with backend Directus collections

Definition of Done:

  • All CRUD operations working via Directus admin interface
  • Form validation prevents invalid data entry
  • Success/error messages provide clear feedback
  • Responsive design works on mobile devices
  • Basic permissions prevent unauthorized access

Technical Tasks:

  • Design and implement tasks collection schema
  • Configure Directus admin interface for tasks
  • Set up form validation rules
  • Implement responsive CSS overrides
  • Add basic permission rules

User Story 1.2: Project Organization System

As a project manager organizing multiple initiatives
I want to group tasks under projects with hierarchical structure
So that I can maintain organization across complex multi-project work

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can create projects with name, description, and metadata
  • Can assign tasks to specific projects
  • Can view project-level task summaries
  • Can create sub-projects for complex initiatives
  • Project completion percentage calculated automatically

Definition of Done:

  • Projects collection with proper relationships implemented
  • Hierarchical project view available in admin interface
  • Task assignment dropdown populated from projects
  • Project dashboard shows progress metrics
  • Bulk task operations available at project level

Technical Tasks:

  • Implement projects collection with self-referential relationships
  • Create project dashboard interface
  • Build progress calculation functions
  • Add bulk operation capabilities
  • Implement project-based filtering

User Story 1.3: Customizable Status Workflow

As a development team lead
I want to define custom task statuses that match our workflow
So that task states accurately reflect our development process

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Can create custom status definitions with names and colors
  • Can configure automatic status transitions based on triggers
  • Status changes tracked in audit log
  • Visual status indicators throughout the interface
  • Default status workflows for common patterns (BMad, GitHub, etc.)

Definition of Done:

  • task_statuses collection with full customization
  • Status transition rules engine implemented
  • Audit logging for all status changes
  • Color-coded status indicators in UI
  • Pre-configured workflow templates available

Technical Tasks:

  • Design task_statuses collection schema
  • Implement status transition rule engine
  • Add audit logging hooks
  • Create status visualization components
  • Build workflow template system

Epic 2: AI Integration & Automation

User Story 2.1: AI-Powered Task Creation

As a developer working with AI agents
I want to create tasks using natural language prompts
So that I can quickly capture work items without manual form entry

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Natural language input box for task creation
  • AI extracts title, description, priority from prompt
  • Suggested project assignment based on context
  • Option to review and modify AI suggestions before saving
  • Integration with existing Directus prompt system

Definition of Done:

  • NLP processing endpoint integrated with task creation
  • AI suggestion review interface implemented
  • Context-aware project suggestion algorithm
  • Integration with Directus ai_prompts collection
  • Error handling for AI service failures

Technical Tasks:

  • Build NLP task creation API endpoint
  • Create AI suggestion review interface
  • Implement project suggestion algorithm
  • Add prompt collection integration
  • Build AI service fallback mechanisms

User Story 2.2: Claude Code Agent Context Integration

As a Claude Code agent working on development tasks
I want to access rich task context through MCP tools
So that I can provide more targeted and effective assistance

Acceptance Criteria:

  • MCP tools provide current task details to agents
  • Task context includes dependencies, project info, and history
  • Agents can update task progress through MCP tools
  • Agent activity logged in task context
  • Multiple agents can work on related tasks with shared context

Definition of Done:

  • 22 new MCP tools implemented for task operations
  • Rich task context API providing all necessary data
  • Agent progress update mechanisms working
  • Activity logging capturing agent interactions
  • Multi-agent coordination through shared task context

Technical Tasks:

  • Implement 22 MCP tools for task management
  • Build rich context API endpoints
  • Create agent progress update system
  • Add comprehensive activity logging
  • Design multi-agent coordination patterns

User Story 2.3: Automated Progress Tracking

As a project manager monitoring development progress
I want to receive automatic updates when tasks advance through workflows
So that I can track progress without manual status updates

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Git commit patterns automatically update task status
  • Pull request events trigger status transitions
  • Time tracking captures development activity
  • Progress percentages update based on subtask completion
  • Automated notifications for status changes

Definition of Done:

  • Git integration webhooks processing commits and PRs
  • Automated status transition rules implemented
  • Time tracking system capturing activity
  • Progress calculation algorithms working
  • Notification system sending relevant updates

Technical Tasks:

  • Implement git webhook processing
  • Build automated status transition engine
  • Create time tracking integration
  • Develop progress calculation algorithms
  • Add notification delivery system

Epic 3: Workflow Integration & Collaboration

User Story 3.1: BMad Methodology Integration

As a developer following BMad methodology
I want to create epics and stories that align with BMad workflows
So that my task management supports my established development process

Acceptance Criteria:

  • BMad epic template creates proper task hierarchies
  • Workflow steps tracked for each BMad phase
  • Agent assignment based on BMad role requirements
  • Progress tracking aligned with BMad milestones
  • Integration with existing BMad planning documents

Definition of Done:

  • BMad workflow templates implemented
  • Task hierarchy creation from epic templates
  • BMad phase tracking system operational
  • Agent-role assignment algorithms working
  • Integration with planning document system

Technical Tasks:

  • Build BMad workflow template system
  • Implement epic-to-tasks generation
  • Create BMad phase tracking
  • Develop agent assignment logic
  • Add planning document integration

User Story 3.2: Task Master Bidirectional Sync

As a power user comfortable with CLI tools
I want to maintain my Task Master workflow while gaining web UI benefits
So that I can use both interfaces interchangeably without data conflicts

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Changes in Task Master sync to Directus automatically
  • Changes in Directus sync to Task Master automatically
  • Conflict resolution handles simultaneous edits
  • Sync status visible in both interfaces
  • Fallback to manual sync if automated sync fails

Definition of Done:

  • Bidirectional sync service implemented and tested
  • Conflict resolution algorithm handling edge cases
  • Sync status indicators in both UIs
  • Manual sync commands available as fallback
  • Data integrity validation preventing corruption

Technical Tasks:

  • Build bidirectional sync service
  • Implement conflict resolution algorithms
  • Add sync status tracking and display
  • Create manual sync command interface
  • Build data integrity validation

User Story 3.3: Team Collaboration Features

As a team member collaborating on AI projects
I want to share tasks, assign work, and track team progress
So that multiple people can coordinate effectively on complex projects

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Task assignment to team members through user interface
  • Comments and discussion threads on tasks
  • Team workload visualization and balancing
  • Shared project dashboards for team visibility
  • Role-based permissions for different team functions

Definition of Done:

  • User assignment system with dropdown selection
  • Commenting system with threaded discussions
  • Workload dashboard showing team capacity
  • Shared dashboard accessible to team members
  • Comprehensive permission system protecting sensitive data

Technical Tasks:

  • Implement user assignment interface
  • Build commenting and discussion system
  • Create workload visualization dashboard
  • Develop shared team dashboards
  • Configure role-based access control

Epic 4: Advanced Analytics & Optimization

User Story 4.1: Progress Analytics Dashboard

As a project stakeholder tracking development initiatives
I want to view comprehensive analytics on task completion and velocity
So that I can make data-driven decisions about project planning and resource allocation

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Velocity tracking showing tasks completed over time
  • Burndown charts for sprint and project planning
  • Resource utilization showing team member workload
  • Completion time predictions based on historical data
  • Custom date ranges and filtering options

Definition of Done:

  • Analytics dashboard with multiple chart types
  • Historical data analysis providing insights
  • Predictive algorithms for completion estimates
  • Customizable reporting with filter options
  • Export capabilities for external reporting

Technical Tasks:

  • Build analytics dashboard infrastructure
  • Implement data analysis algorithms
  • Create predictive completion models
  • Add customizable filtering system
  • Build export functionality

User Story 4.2: Performance Optimization & Scaling

As a system administrator managing growing project data
I want to ensure optimal performance as task volume increases
So that the system remains responsive and reliable under heavy usage

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Page load times remain under 100ms for common operations
  • Database queries optimized with proper indexing
  • Caching system reduces API call frequency
  • Pagination handles large task lists efficiently
  • Background processing for heavy operations

Definition of Done:

  • Performance benchmarks meeting targets under load
  • Database optimization with measured improvements
  • Caching system reducing response times
  • Efficient pagination with cursor-based implementation
  • Background job processing for intensive tasks

Technical Tasks:

  • Implement performance monitoring and benchmarks
  • Optimize database queries and add strategic indexes
  • Build caching layer with appropriate TTL settings
  • Create cursor-based pagination system
  • Add background job processing capabilities

Sprint Planning

Sprint 1 (Weeks 1-2): Foundation Sprint

Goal: Establish core task management functionality with basic web interface

Sprint Backlog:

  • User Story 1.1: Basic Task CRUD Operations (8 points)
  • User Story 1.2: Project Organization System (5 points)
  • User Story 1.3: Customizable Status Workflow (5 points)

Sprint Deliverables:

  • Functional task management via Directus admin interface
  • Project hierarchy with task assignment
  • Customizable status system with visual indicators

Definition of Ready:

  • All schemas designed and validated
  • Directus instance configured for development
  • Development environment set up and tested

Definition of Done:

  • All acceptance criteria met for included user stories
  • Code reviewed and approved
  • Basic testing completed
  • Documentation updated

Sprint 2 (Weeks 3-4): AI Integration Sprint

Goal: Implement AI-powered features and agent integration

Sprint Backlog:

  • User Story 2.1: AI-Powered Task Creation (8 points)
  • User Story 2.2: Claude Code Agent Context Integration (13 points)
  • User Story 2.3: Automated Progress Tracking (8 points)

Sprint Deliverables:

  • Natural language task creation working
  • 22 MCP tools providing agent integration
  • Automated status updates from git activity

Definition of Ready:

  • AI prompt system integration points identified
  • MCP tool development patterns established
  • Git webhook integration architecture designed

Definition of Done:

  • AI task creation working with high accuracy
  • All MCP tools implemented and tested
  • Automated tracking reducing manual updates by 80%

Sprint 3 (Weeks 5-6): Workflow Integration Sprint

Goal: Integrate with existing BMad and Task Master workflows

Sprint Backlog:

  • User Story 3.1: BMad Methodology Integration (8 points)
  • User Story 3.2: Task Master Bidirectional Sync (13 points)
  • User Story 3.3: Team Collaboration Features (8 points)

Sprint Deliverables:

  • BMad workflow templates and tracking
  • Bidirectional Task Master synchronization
  • Team collaboration through web interface

Definition of Ready:

  • BMad workflow patterns documented and analyzed
  • Task Master sync architecture validated
  • Team collaboration requirements defined

Definition of Done:

  • BMad users can follow established workflows
  • Task Master and Directus operate seamlessly together
  • Team members can collaborate effectively

Sprint 4 (Weeks 7-8): Analytics & Optimization Sprint

Goal: Deliver analytics capabilities and optimize system performance

Sprint Backlog:

  • User Story 4.1: Progress Analytics Dashboard (8 points)
  • User Story 4.2: Performance Optimization & Scaling (5 points)
  • Technical debt and polish items (5 points)

Sprint Deliverables:

  • Comprehensive analytics dashboard
  • Performance optimizations for scale
  • Production-ready system with monitoring

Definition of Ready:

  • Analytics requirements defined with stakeholders
  • Performance benchmarks established
  • Production deployment plan prepared

Definition of Done:

  • Analytics provide actionable insights
  • System performance meets all targets
  • Production deployment successful

Release Planning

Release 1.0: MVP (End of Sprint 2)

Features:

  • Core task management with web UI
  • AI-powered task creation
  • Basic Claude Code agent integration

Success Criteria:

  • 50+ tasks created through web interface
  • 80% of tasks created using AI assistance
  • Agents successfully using task context

Release 2.0: Workflow Integration (End of Sprint 3)

Features:

  • BMad methodology support
  • Task Master bidirectional sync
  • Team collaboration capabilities

Success Criteria:

  • BMad workflows fully supported
  • 100% sync reliability with Task Master
  • Team collaboration actively used

Release 3.0: Enterprise Features (End of Sprint 4)

Features:

  • Advanced analytics dashboard
  • Performance optimizations
  • Full production deployment

Success Criteria:

  • Analytics driving project decisions
  • System handling 10,000+ tasks efficiently
  • 99.9% system availability

Story Estimation & Velocity

Story Point Scale (Fibonacci)

  • 1 Point: Simple configuration or minor UI change
  • 2 Points: Basic CRUD operation implementation
  • 3 Points: Moderate complexity feature with some integration
  • 5 Points: Complex feature requiring multiple components
  • 8 Points: Major feature with significant integration requirements
  • 13 Points: Epic-level feature requiring multiple sprint cycles

Estimated Team Velocity

  • Sprint Capacity: 18 story points per 2-week sprint
  • Team Size: 1-2 developers
  • Experience Level: High with existing codebase and tools
  • Risk Buffer: 20% capacity reserved for unexpected complexity

Dependencies & Risks

Inter-Sprint Dependencies:

  • Sprint 2 depends on Sprint 1 foundation
  • Sprint 3 Task Master sync requires Sprint 1 data models
  • Sprint 4 analytics require Sprint 2-3 data generation

Key Risks:

  • Task Master Integration Complexity: May require additional sprint time
  • AI Service Reliability: Backup plans needed for AI failures
  • Directus Performance: May need additional optimization work
  • Team Capacity: Single-person development may impact velocity

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Early Proof of Concepts: Validate complex integrations early
  • Incremental Delivery: Each sprint delivers working features
  • Fallback Plans: Manual processes available if automation fails
  • External Help: Consider additional development resources if needed

This comprehensive user story and sprint plan provides a clear roadmap for delivering the Directus Task Management Suite while maintaining focus on user value and technical excellence.