266 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
266 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
## 🎯 **Detailed Task Breakdown**
|
|
|
|
### **Task #8: Complete Phase 3 - Integrate Domain Adaptation into Main Pipeline**
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 8.1: Connect LoRA Adapters to Transcription Workflow**
|
|
- **Objective**: Integrate existing LoRA adapters into the main transcription pipeline
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Modify `MultiPassTranscriptionPipeline` to use `LoRAAdapterManager`
|
|
2. Add LoRA model loading to the enhancement pass
|
|
3. Implement domain-specific model switching during transcription
|
|
4. Add LoRA adapter caching and memory management
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- LoRA adapters are loaded and used during domain enhancement
|
|
- Memory usage remains under 2GB during LoRA operations
|
|
- Domain-specific transcription shows measurable accuracy improvements
|
|
- **Testing**: Test with technical, medical, and academic audio samples
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 8.2: Integrate Domain Detection into Pipeline**
|
|
- **Objective**: Make domain detection an active part of the transcription process
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Add domain detection to the first pass of transcription
|
|
2. Implement automatic domain selection based on content analysis
|
|
3. Connect domain detection to LoRA adapter selection
|
|
4. Add domain confidence scoring and fallback mechanisms
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- Domain is automatically detected with >90% accuracy
|
|
- Appropriate LoRA adapter is automatically selected
|
|
- Fallback to general model when domain is uncertain
|
|
- **Testing**: Test with mixed-domain content and edge cases
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 8.3: Implement Domain-Specific Enhancement Pipeline**
|
|
- **Objective**: Create specialized enhancement workflows for different domains
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Create domain-specific enhancement strategies
|
|
2. Implement technical terminology enhancement
|
|
3. Add medical/academic vocabulary optimization
|
|
4. Create domain-specific quality metrics
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- Technical content shows improved accuracy on jargon
|
|
- Medical content has better medical terminology recognition
|
|
- Academic content shows improved citation and reference handling
|
|
- **Testing**: Domain-specific accuracy benchmarks
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 8.4: End-to-End Testing of Domain Integration**
|
|
- **Objective**: Validate complete domain adaptation workflow
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Create comprehensive domain-specific test suites
|
|
2. Test LoRA adapter switching under load
|
|
3. Validate memory management and cleanup
|
|
4. Performance testing with domain-specific content
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- All domain-specific tests pass
|
|
- Performance remains within targets
|
|
- Memory usage is stable and predictable
|
|
- **Testing**: Full integration test suite
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### **Task #9: Complete Phase 4 - Integrate Enhanced CLI into Main Interface**
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 9.1: Merge Enhanced CLI Features into Main Interface**
|
|
- **Objective**: Make enhanced CLI the primary interface while maintaining compatibility
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Integrate `GranularProgressTracker` into main CLI commands
|
|
2. Add `MultiPassProgressTracker` for multi-pass operations
|
|
3. Integrate `SystemResourceMonitor` for real-time monitoring
|
|
4. Add `ErrorRecoveryProgressTracker` for error handling
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- All enhanced progress tracking works in main CLI
|
|
- No regression in existing CLI functionality
|
|
- Progress tracking is consistent across all commands
|
|
- **Testing**: CLI regression testing and progress tracking validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 9.2: Implement Unified CLI Command Structure**
|
|
- **Objective**: Create consistent command structure across all CLI interfaces
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Standardize command options and flags
|
|
2. Implement consistent progress reporting
|
|
3. Add unified error handling and recovery
|
|
4. Create consistent output formatting
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- All CLI commands follow the same pattern
|
|
- Progress reporting is consistent and informative
|
|
- Error messages are clear and actionable
|
|
- **Testing**: CLI consistency testing and user experience validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 9.3: Add Advanced CLI Features**
|
|
- **Objective**: Implement advanced CLI capabilities for power users
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Add batch processing with progress tracking
|
|
2. Implement configuration file support
|
|
3. Add CLI completion and help system
|
|
4. Create interactive mode for complex operations
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- Batch processing shows individual file progress
|
|
- Configuration files are properly loaded and validated
|
|
- CLI help is comprehensive and useful
|
|
- **Testing**: Advanced CLI feature testing and user workflow validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 9.4: CLI Documentation and User Experience**
|
|
- **Objective**: Complete CLI documentation and optimize user experience
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Update CLI documentation with all features
|
|
2. Create usage examples and tutorials
|
|
3. Add CLI validation and error prevention
|
|
4. Optimize command-line argument parsing
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- CLI documentation is complete and accurate
|
|
- User experience is intuitive and error-free
|
|
- Help system provides actionable guidance
|
|
- **Testing**: Documentation accuracy and user experience testing
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### **Task #10: Implement Phase 5 - Performance Optimization and Final Polish**
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 10.1: Performance Benchmarking and Optimization**
|
|
- **Objective**: Achieve and exceed all performance targets
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Implement comprehensive performance benchmarking
|
|
2. Optimize memory usage and garbage collection
|
|
3. Optimize CPU usage and parallel processing
|
|
4. Implement adaptive performance tuning
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- 5-minute audio processed in <25 seconds (exceeding v2 target)
|
|
- Memory usage stays under 2GB consistently
|
|
- CPU utilization is optimized for M3 MacBook
|
|
- **Testing**: Performance benchmarking with various audio types and lengths
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 4-5 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 10.2: Memory Management and Resource Optimization**
|
|
- **Objective**: Optimize resource usage for production deployment
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Implement intelligent model caching
|
|
2. Optimize LoRA adapter memory management
|
|
3. Add memory usage monitoring and alerts
|
|
4. Implement resource cleanup and garbage collection
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- Memory usage is predictable and stable
|
|
- Resource cleanup happens automatically
|
|
- System remains responsive under load
|
|
- **Testing**: Memory stress testing and resource monitoring validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 10.3: Final Testing and Validation**
|
|
- **Objective**: Comprehensive testing of all v2.0 features
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. End-to-end testing of complete v2.0 pipeline
|
|
2. Performance testing with real-world audio samples
|
|
3. Stress testing with large files and batch operations
|
|
4. User acceptance testing and workflow validation
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- All tests pass consistently
|
|
- Performance targets are met or exceeded
|
|
- User workflows are smooth and reliable
|
|
- **Testing**: Full test suite execution and user workflow validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 10.4: Documentation and Deployment Preparation**
|
|
- **Objective**: Complete documentation and prepare for production
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Update all documentation to reflect v2.0 features
|
|
2. Create deployment guides and production checklists
|
|
3. Prepare release notes and migration guides
|
|
4. Create monitoring and maintenance documentation
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- Documentation is complete and accurate
|
|
- Deployment process is documented and tested
|
|
- Production readiness checklist is complete
|
|
- **Testing**: Documentation review and deployment process validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### **Task #11: Complete v2.0 Foundation and Prepare for Production**
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 11.1: Final Integration and System Testing**
|
|
- **Objective**: Validate complete v2.0 system integration
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Full system integration testing
|
|
2. Cross-component compatibility validation
|
|
3. Performance regression testing
|
|
4. Security and stability validation
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- All components work together seamlessly
|
|
- No performance regressions from v1.0
|
|
- System is stable and secure
|
|
- **Testing**: Full system test suite and security validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 11.2: Production Deployment Preparation**
|
|
- **Objective**: Prepare for production deployment
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Create production deployment scripts
|
|
2. Implement production monitoring and logging
|
|
3. Create backup and recovery procedures
|
|
4. Prepare production environment configuration
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- Deployment process is automated and reliable
|
|
- Monitoring provides actionable insights
|
|
- Recovery procedures are tested and documented
|
|
- **Testing**: Deployment process testing and monitoring validation
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
#### **Subtask 11.3: Final Quality Assurance and Release**
|
|
- **Objective**: Final quality checks and release preparation
|
|
- **Implementation Steps**:
|
|
1. Final code review and quality checks
|
|
2. Performance validation against all targets
|
|
3. User acceptance testing completion
|
|
4. Release preparation and announcement
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- All quality gates are passed
|
|
- Performance targets are exceeded
|
|
- Release is ready for production use
|
|
- **Testing**: Final quality validation and release testing
|
|
- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📅 **Implementation Timeline**
|
|
|
|
### **Week 1: Phase 3 Completion**
|
|
- **Days 1-4**: Complete Task #8 (Domain Adaptation Integration)
|
|
- **Day 5**: Testing and validation of Phase 3
|
|
|
|
### **Week 2: Phase 4 Completion**
|
|
- **Days 1-4**: Complete Task #9 (Enhanced CLI Integration)
|
|
- **Day 5**: Testing and validation of Phase 4
|
|
|
|
### **Week 3: Phase 5 and Final Integration**
|
|
- **Days 1-3**: Complete Task #10 (Performance Optimization)
|
|
- **Days 4-5**: Complete Task #11 (Final Integration and Production Prep)
|
|
|
|
### **Total Estimated Time**: 3 weeks (15 working days)
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 **Success Metrics**
|
|
|
|
### **Technical Metrics**
|
|
- **Performance**: 5-minute audio processed in <25 seconds
|
|
- **Accuracy**: 99.5%+ transcription accuracy with domain enhancement
|
|
- **Memory**: <2GB memory usage during processing
|
|
- **Reliability**: 99.9% uptime and error-free operation
|
|
|
|
### **Quality Metrics**
|
|
- **Test Coverage**: 100% test coverage maintained
|
|
- **Documentation**: Complete and accurate documentation
|
|
- **User Experience**: Intuitive and error-free CLI interface
|
|
- **Production Ready**: All production requirements met
|
|
|
|
### **Completion Criteria**
|
|
- **Phase 3**: Domain adaptation fully integrated and tested
|
|
- **Phase 4**: Enhanced CLI is the primary interface
|
|
- **Phase 5**: All performance targets exceeded
|
|
- **Overall**: 100% v2.0 foundation complete and production ready
|
|
|
|
This plan provides a clear roadmap to complete Trax v2.0 foundation and achieve 100% implementation of all planned features. The phased approach ensures manageable progress while maintaining quality and testing throughout the process.
|